by Elder Lloyd T. Lockett

The Apostolic Note

Anthropomorphism

Seeing God through the finality of the

Homo sapiens

Case #10

Brothers, in exploring the richness of God’s word I find one thing that

will bring clarity to the problem at hand. We Will not find any new revealing or unveiling of Yod-He-Vev-He, {YH-WH} the tetragrammaton. The Godhead {All that makes God ,”God” or “All that God is”  God’s Godness} and word –image {God’s Incarnation in human form} must be intact in order for the idea of Father and Son to be of proper use to the anthropos. This is also true of the statement applied to the Oneness reasoning “Father of  Creation and Son of Redemption” as well.

I must note that the Hypostatic Union {The inseparable relationship between the deity and humanity of the God-man Y'shua or the dual  nature simultaneously united in Jesus without compromising the full sum of those natures} is what makes Jesus, Jesus. To this I must add that, Father of Creation gives definition to son in Redemption, for they are intrinsic in will and Intermutual in purpose.

The purpose of the Son is to do the Fathers will, Hebrews.10:7,9 ; Luke.22:42. One can not use the theology of negations or in other words for a better definition, the applying of, Negative theology { Expounding on what God is not, rather than declaring what God is}. For example, lets use the idea  of Complexity. Complexity Is what is common to created things, so simplicity can only embrace the perfection of God’s immutable self-image as one that can’t be added to or subtracted from. If God is complex in any way, something or someone gave or removed a part in God. If this is so, the thing that brought about Potentiality in God then would be God, for God gives Potential and can not receive it. So when God became man he did not stop being God, Philippians.2:5-9.

Negating Father of Creation and applying a new rendering such as God/Creator  “perceived as a better usage“  by the reasoning of man, will with great damage interpolate new meaning into the reality of Sonship as it pertains to Jesus and exterpolate the Anthropomorphic view {The finite anthropos in all his depravity as a complexed entity, due to an absolute finite existence, can have no intuitive knowledge of  infinite Deity. No language of rational creatures can fully express the nature of God and render it comprehensible, so finite man must use finite words to best reflect a plausible understanding of a infinite God} Ps.50:21.