Human emotion

Gen.6:6; Exodus.20:5; Judges.2:35;

1sam.15:35

Human action

Exodus.32:14; 2Sam.24:16;

Gen.9:16; Gen.2:2

Human physique

Num.62:4; Psalm.34:15; psalm.89:10

 Or God having wings

Psalm57:1

The OT Jew as well as the NT Primitive Judaic Christian understood only what they experienced as Homo Sapiens. After all, truth must be experienced in order for reason to respond to that truth received by the one experiencing it. The Theotes {Godhead} and the Modalistic Monarchians stand {We that retain the belief from early Church History as Judaic Christian and Acts 2 believers, that emphasized the undivided unity and sovereignty ”Monarchia” of God} maintain the belief of the office, title or mold  “Father of Creation” to be, not spurious nor extrabibical by no stretch of the imagination.

NO! our Theology was not some fluke added to take-up space within the Oneness integrative theology {Intended for the exploration and presentation of truth, and not for the defending of an already established theology}.

Men of God, we must not forget that for over 1700 years, this powerful truth has been the catalyst of the biblical foundation of Judaic Christendom and it is worded as such: The One God is,

Father of Creation, Son of Redemption, Holy Spirit In Sanctification

 This truth came from a native of the Libyan Pentapolis and was the Legitimate successor of Praxeas and Noetus, as well as the representative of their school. His name is, Sabellius. Note: that this theology is not man made, Sabellianism is basically equivalent to modern Oneness thought.

This is not the tritheistic polytheism of the triune Religious-view, this is Oneness theology.

  by Elder Lloyd T. Lockett

The Apostolic Note

Anthropomorphism

Seeing God through the finality of the

Homo sapiens

Case #11

Anthropomorphic view

{The finite anthropos in all his depravity as a complexed entity, due to an absolute finite existence, can have no intuitive knowledge of  infinite Deity. No language of rational creatures can fully express the nature of God and render it as comprehensible. So finite man must use finite words to best reflect a plausible understanding of a infinite God} Ps.50:21.